10 trades entered
Audit
What the initial stop field predicts. Open trades are marked to market throughout — reading the closed record alone flatters trades taken without a stop.
With a stop
3
net +₹5,471 · worst +0.7%
No stop
7
net −₹9,194 · worst −63.8%
Win rate
100% / 57.1%
with a stop / without — the stop does not raise it
Losses past 8%
0 / 1
with a stop / without
Concentration
How much of the closed record rests on its single biggest winner
Every loss worse than 8%
The rulebook's widest stop. This list is what the stop field caps.
| Stock | Stop | Return | Net P&L |
|---|---|---|---|
|
RMDRIP open
|
none | −63.8% | −₹15,040 |
Why the closed record flatters the no-stop trades
The same split twice: closed trades only, then everything marked to market
| Trades | Net P&L | Win rate | Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closed only | ||||
| Stop recorded | 2 | +₹5,234 | 100% | +₹2,617 |
| No stop | 6 | +₹5,846 | 66.7% | +₹974 |
| All entered, marked to market | ||||
| Stop recorded · 1 open | 3 | +₹5,471 | 100% | +₹1,824 |
| No stop · 1 open | 7 | −₹9,194 | 57.1% | −₹1,313 |
| Never booked | −₹15,040 | held in open no-stop positions | ||
Not stopping out does not reduce a loss — it moves the loss out of the statistics. Winners get sold and booked; losers stay open and stay unrealised, so they never join the closed record.
Did you write a stop down?
Trades opened each quarter, and the share that had one. A gap is a quarter with no trades.
22%
Q1 '26
n=9
—
Q2 '26
n=0
100%
Q3 '26
n=1
Bar height is trades opened. The filled part had a stop recorded before entry.