63 trades entered
Audit
What the initial stop field predicts. Open trades are marked to market throughout — reading the closed record alone flatters trades taken without a stop.
With a stop
0
net ₹0 · worst —
No stop
63
net −₹18,913 · worst −6.6%
Win rate
— / 58.7%
with a stop / without — the stop does not raise it
Losses past 8%
0 / 0
with a stop / without
Concentration
How much of the closed record rests on its single biggest winner
Every loss worse than 8%
The rulebook's widest stop. This list is what the stop field caps.
No trade has lost more than the widest stop allows.
Why the closed record flatters the no-stop trades
The same split twice: closed trades only, then everything marked to market
| Trades | Net P&L | Win rate | Average | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Closed only | ||||
| Stop recorded | 0 | ₹0 | — | — |
| No stop | 63 | −₹18,913 | 58.7% | −₹300 |
| All entered, marked to market | ||||
| Stop recorded | 0 | ₹0 | — | — |
| No stop | 63 | −₹18,913 | 58.7% | −₹300 |
| Never booked | ₹0 | held in open no-stop positions | ||
Not stopping out does not reduce a loss — it moves the loss out of the statistics. Winners get sold and booked; losers stay open and stay unrealised, so they never join the closed record.
Did you write a stop down?
Trades opened each quarter, and the share that had one. A gap is a quarter with no trades.
0%
Q1 '25
n=39
0%
Q2 '25
n=22
—
Q3 '25
n=0
—
Q4 '25
n=0
0%
Q1 '26
n=2
Bar height is trades opened. The filled part had a stop recorded before entry.